Blogroll
- Asheville Business Blog - Asheville (NC) Area Chamber
- ChamberPost - The U.S. Chamber Blog
- Council of Smaller Enterprises (COSE) Blog
- Dallas Regional Chamber's Blog
- Florida Chamber Blogs
- Greater Boston (MA) Chamber Blog
- Greater Kansas City C/C
- Greater Spokane Incorporated Blog
- HubSpot's Inbound Internet Marketing Blog
- IssuesPA, an initiative of the Pennsylvania Economy League
- Kentucky Chamber Blog
- Maryland Chamber Blog
- Nashville (TN) Chamber Blog
- Salt Lake (UT) Chamber Blog
- Selling in the 21st Century (Membership Sales Blog)
- Stateline.org - State Politics and Policy
- Tacoma-Pierce County Chamber "Live Wire"
- The Avenue - Rethinking Metropolitan America
- The Voice of Business - Greater Lehigh Valley (PA) Chamber Blog
- The Voice of the Lancaster Chamber
- Waukesha County Business Alliance
- Welcome Home - Adirondack (NY) Chamber Blog
Blogs
Ultimate Chamber Mergers
At a meeting with the World Chambers Federation board of directors this weekend, I learned that all of the dozens of chambers in the Netherlands are being forced to merge into one. The number of chambers in France is being cut by a third. These are countries in which membership in compulsory by law. In Spain, the government recently ruled that the chambers would no longer receive the money companies had been paying for the last couple of hundred years for chamber membership. The State would keep (thank you very much) the "tax", leaving the chambers with about 40% of their revenue, provided they can keep program income flowing in.
I recall a number of folks telling me over the years that running a public-law chamber would be so easy because they wouldn't have to work on membership retention. I'm wondering, however, if perhaps a chamber operating where the government requires membership really only has one member?













Leave a Comment